21.8 (2026)

Open

As in 17.57, let $r(m) = \{r + km \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ for integers $0 \leqslant r < m$; for $r_1(m_1) \cap r_2(m_2) = \varnothing$ let the class transposition $\tau_{r_1(m_1), r_2(m_2)}$ be the involution which interchanges $r_1 + tm_1$ and $r_2 + tm_2$ for each integer $t$ and fixes everything else, and let $\text{CT}(\mathbb{Z})$ be the group generated by all class transpositions.

Let $\text{CT}_k$ be the subgroup of $\text{CT}(\mathbb{Z})$ generated by the class transpositions $\tau_{r_1(k), r_2(k)}$ for $0 \leqslant r_1 \neq r_2 < k$. Since $\tau_{r_1(k), r_2(k)}$ permutes the residue classes modulo $k$, the group $\text{CT}_k$ is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_k$. Let $\text{CT}_{(k)} = \langle \text{CT}_2, \text{CT}_3, \dots, \text{CT}_k \rangle$. Is it true that for $k > 3$ the group $\text{CT}_{(k)}$ is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_N$, where $N$ is the least common multiple of the numbers $2, 3, \dots, k$?

Progress

*Yes, it is true (Junyao Pan, Preprint of 14 April 2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12553; P. Monticone, Preprint of 30 April 2026, https://kourovkanotebookorg.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/21_8-1.pdf).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.