21.8 (2026)
OpenAs in 17.57, let $r(m) = \{r + km \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ for integers $0 \leqslant r < m$; for $r_1(m_1) \cap r_2(m_2) = \varnothing$ let the class transposition $\tau_{r_1(m_1), r_2(m_2)}$ be the involution which interchanges $r_1 + tm_1$ and $r_2 + tm_2$ for each integer $t$ and fixes everything else, and let $\text{CT}(\mathbb{Z})$ be the group generated by all class transpositions.
Let $\text{CT}_k$ be the subgroup of $\text{CT}(\mathbb{Z})$ generated by the class transpositions $\tau_{r_1(k), r_2(k)}$ for $0 \leqslant r_1 \neq r_2 < k$. Since $\tau_{r_1(k), r_2(k)}$ permutes the residue classes modulo $k$, the group $\text{CT}_k$ is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_k$. Let $\text{CT}_{(k)} = \langle \text{CT}_2, \text{CT}_3, \dots, \text{CT}_k \rangle$. Is it true that for $k > 3$ the group $\text{CT}_{(k)}$ is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_N$, where $N$ is the least common multiple of the numbers $2, 3, \dots, k$?
Progress
*Yes, it is true (Junyao Pan, Preprint of 14 April 2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12553; P. Monticone, Preprint of 30 April 2026, https://kourovkanotebookorg.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/21_8-1.pdf).
Proof claims
No proof claims yet.
Log in to claim a proof.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Log in to post a comment.