15.45 (2002)

Open

We define the class of hierarchically decomposable groups in the following way. First, if $\mathfrak{X}$ is any class of groups, then let $\mathbf{H}_1 \mathfrak{X}$ denote the class of groups which admit an admissible action on a finite-dimensional contractible complex in such a way that every cell stabilizer belongs to $\mathfrak{X}$. Then the ``big'' class $\mathbf{H}\mathfrak{X}$ is defined to be the smallest $\mathbf{H}_1$-closed class containing $\mathfrak{X}$.
$\qquad$ a) Let $\mathfrak{F}$ be the class of all finite groups. Find an example of an $\mathbf{H}\mathfrak{F}$ group which is not in $\mathbf{H}_3\mathfrak{F}$ ($= \mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{H}_1\mathfrak{F}$).
$\qquad$ b) Prove or disprove that there is an ordinal $\alpha$ such that $\mathbf{H}_\alpha\mathfrak{F} = \mathbf{H}\mathfrak{F}$, where $\mathbf{H}_\alpha$ is the operator on classes of groups defined by transfinite induction in the obvious way starting from $\mathbf{H}_1$.

Progress

*a) Such an example is found; moreover, for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there are groups in $\mathbf{H}_{\alpha+1}\mathfrak{F}$ that are not in $\mathbf{H}_\alpha\mathfrak{F}$ (T. Januszkiewicz, P. H. Kropholler, I. J. Leary, Bull. London Math. Soc., 42, No. 5 (2010), 896–904). Furthermore, torsion-free examples with similar properties have been constructed (F. Fournier-Facio, B. Sun, Preprint, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01987v3).

b) Editor’s comment: It is proved that such an ordinal cannot be countable (T. Januszkiewicz, P. H. Kropholler, I. J. Leary, Bull. London Math. Soc., 42, No. 5 (2010), 896–904).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.