14.73 (1999)

Open

Conjecture: There is a function $f$ on the natural numbers such that, if $\Gamma$ is a finite, vertex-transitive, locally-quasiprimitive graph of valency $v$, then the number of automorphisms fixing a given vertex is at most $f(v)$. (By definition, a vertex-transitive graph $\Gamma$ is locally-quasiprimitive if the stabilizer in $\operatorname{Aut}(\Gamma)$ of a vertex $\alpha$ is quasiprimitive (see 14.46) in its action on the set of vertices adjacent to $\alpha$.)

To prove the conjecture above one need only consider the case where $\operatorname{Aut}(\Gamma)$ has the property that every non-trivial normal subgroup has at most two orbits on vertices (C. E. Praeger, Ars Combin., 19 A (1985), 149–163). The analogous conjecture for finite, vertex-transitive, locally-primitive graphs was made by R. Weiss in 1978 and is still open. For non-bipartite graphs, there is a “reduction” of Weiss’ conjecture to the case where the automorphism group is almost simple (see 14.46 for definition) (M. Conder, C. H. Li, C. E. Praeger, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 43, no. 1 (2000), 129–138).

Progress

Comment of 2013: These conjectures have been proved in the case where there is an upper bound on the degree of any alternating group occurring as a quotient of a subgroup (C. E. Praeger, L. Pyber, P. Spiga, E. Szabo, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 140, no. 7 (2012), 2307–2318). Comment of 2021: This has been proved in the case where the group induced on the neighbourhood of a vertex has an abelian regular normal subgroup (P. Spiga, Bull. London Math. Soc., 48, no. 1 (2016), 12–18).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.