5.56 (1976)

Partially Solved

a) Let $p$ be a prime greater than 3. Is it true that every finite group of exponent $p$ can be embedded in the commutator subgroup of a finite group of exponent $p$?
b) Does there exist a locally nilpotent group of prime exponent that coincides with its derived subgroup (and hence has no maximal subgroups)?

Progress

b) Yes, there does. Every non-soluble variety $\mathfrak{V}$ contains a non-trivial group coinciding with the derived subgroup, the direct limit of the spectrum $F \xrightarrow{\varphi} F \xrightarrow{\varphi} \dots$, where $F$ is the free group in $\mathfrak{V}$ on the free generators $x_i, a_2, \dots$ and $\varphi$ is the homomorphism given by $x_i \to [x_{2i-1}, x_{2i}]$. As shown in (Yu. P. Razmyslov, Algebra and Logic, 10 (1971), 21–29) the Kostrikin variety of locally nilpotent groups of prime exponent $p \geqslant 5$ is unsoluble. (E. I. Khukhro, I. V. L’vov, Letter of June, 19, 1976.) The same was also proved in (Yu. A. Kolmakov, Math. Notes, 35, no. 5-6 (1984), 389–391). An example answering the question was also produced in (M. R. Vaughan-Lee, J. Wiegold, Bull. London Math. Soc., 13, no. 1 (1981), 45–46).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.