21.17 (2026)

Open

If $\mathfrak{X}$ is a class of groups, let $\mathbf{H}(\mathfrak{X})$ denote the class of homomorphic images of groups in $\mathfrak{X}$, let $\mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{X})$ denote the class of groups isomorphic to subgroups of groups in $\mathfrak{X}$, let $\mathbf{P}(\mathfrak{X})$ denote the class of groups isomorphic to (unrestricted) direct products of families of groups in $\mathfrak{X}$, and let $\mathbf{P}_f(\mathfrak{X})$ denote the class of groups isomorphic to direct products of finite families of groups in $\mathfrak{X}$. By Birkhoff’s theorem, $\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{S}(\mathbf{P}(\mathfrak{X})))$ is the variety of groups generated by $\mathfrak{X}$.

If $\mathfrak{M}$ is a class of metabelian groups, must $\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{S}(\mathbf{P}_f(\mathfrak{M}))) \subseteq \mathbf{S}(\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{P}(\mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{M}))))$? This is Question 27 in (G. M. Bergman, Algebra Universalis, 26 (1989), 267–283).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.