21.112 (2026)

Open

A nonempty class $\mathfrak{X}$ of finite groups is said to be complete if $\mathfrak{X}$ is closed under taking subgroups, homomorphic images, and extensions. The symmetric boundary of a complete class $\mathfrak{X}$ other than the class of all finite groups is defined as the largest integer $n$ such that $S_n \in \mathfrak{X}$. Every positive integer $n \neq 3$ coincides with the symmetric boundary of some complete class. It is proved (mod CFSG, D. O. Revin, Algebra i Analiz, 37, no. 1 (2025), 141–176 (Russian)) that, for every complete class $\mathfrak{X}$, there exists a nonnegative integer $m$ with the following property: for every finite group $G$ and each conjugacy class $D$ of $G$, if every $m$ elements of $D$ generate a subgroup belonging to $\mathfrak{X}$, then $\langle D \rangle \in \mathfrak{X}$. The smallest such $m$ is called the Baer–Suzuki width of $\mathfrak{X}$ denoted by $\text{BS}(\mathfrak{X})$. It is also proved (mod CFSG, ibid.) that, for a complete class $\mathfrak{X}$ of symmetric boundary $n$, the value of $\text{BS}(\mathfrak{X})$ is at least $n$ and is bounded above in terms of $n$. For every positive integer $n \neq 3$, let $f_+(n)$ and $f_-(n)$ be respectively the maximum and the minimum of $\text{BS}(\mathfrak{X})$, where $\mathfrak{X}$ runs over all complete classes of symmetric boundary $n$.
$\qquad$ a) Find $f_+(n)$ for $n = 4, 5, 6$. It is known that $f_+(1) = 2, f_+(2) = 3$, and $f_+(n) = 2(n - 1)$ for $n \geqslant 7$.
$\qquad$ b) Is it true that $f_-(n) = n$ for all $n \neq 3$? This is known to be true for $n = 1, 2, 4$.

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.