20.92 (2022)

Open

This question is about existence of an analogue of the Lazard correspondence for pre-Lie algebras and braces. A pre-Lie algebra $A$ is a vector space with a bilinear operation $(x, y) \to xy$ satisfying $(xy)z - x(yz) = (yx)z - y(xz)$ for every $x, y, z \in A$. A pre-Lie algebra $A$ is said to be left nilpotent if, for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$, $A \cdot (A \cdot (A \dots A)) = 0$ where $A$ appears $n$ times in the product. Recall that a set $A$ with binary operations $+$ and $\circ$ is a left brace if $(A, +)$ is an abelian group, $(A, \circ)$ is a group, and $a \circ (b+c) + a = a \circ b + a \circ c$ for every $a, b, c \in A$. Let $p$ be a prime, and $\mathbb{F}_p$ the field of $p$ elements. A left brace $A$ is called an $\mathbb{F}_p$-brace if its additive group is an $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector space such that $a \ast (\alpha b) = \alpha(a \ast b)$ for all $a, b \in A$, $\alpha \in \mathbb{F}_p$, where $a \ast b = a \circ b - a - b$. The idea of a connection between braces and pre-Lie algebras comes from a paper by W. Rump (2014).

a) Let $A$ be an $\mathbb{F}_p$-brace of cardinality $p^k$ for some $k$. Is it true that when $p$ is sufficiently large relative to $k$, the set $A$ with the same additive operation $+$ and with the operation $\cdot$ defined as $a \cdot b = -\sum_{i=0}^{p-2} \frac{1}{2^i} ((2^i a) \ast b)$ is a pre-Lie algebra?

(b) Let $k$ be a natural number, and let $p$ be a prime number such that $p > 2^k$. Is there a bijective correspondence between $\mathbb{F}_p$-braces of cardinality $p^k$ and left nilpotent pre-Lie algebras over $\mathbb{F}_p$ of cardinality $p^k$?

An affirmative answer to any of the above questions would have consequences for the theory of set-theoretic solutions of the Yang–Baxter equation and for the theory of Hopf–Galois extensions.

Progress

(a) Comment of 2025: If $2 \equiv \xi^{p^{n-1}}$ when $\xi$ is a primitive root modulo $p$, and if $A$ is strongly nilpotent of nilpotency index less than $p$, then the result follows by (A. Smoktunowicz, Adv. Math., 409, part B (2022), 108683). It is not known if the result follows when $A$ is not strongly nilpotent.

(b) Yes, there is (S. Trappeniers, Preprint, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02475).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.