20.33 (2022)

Open

(A. Bauer). Does Higman’s Embedding Theorem relativize in the following way? Is it the case that for every subset $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$, there is a finitely generated group $G_X$ that has an $X$-computable presentation (that is, there is a finite generating set relative to which the set of relations is computably enumerable with an $X$ oracle), and such that any finitely generated group has an $X$-computable presentation if and only if it can be embedded as a finitely generated subgroup of a quotient of a free product of finitely many copies of $G_X$ by the normal closure of a finite subset?

Higman’s Embedding Theorem says that for computable $X$, one may take $G_X = \mathbb{Z}$.

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.