2.43 (1966)

Solved

A group $G$ is called an FN-group if the groups $\gamma_i G / \gamma_{i+1} G$ are free abelian and $\bigcap_{i=1}^\infty \gamma_i G = 1$, where $\gamma_{i+1} G = [\gamma_i G, G]$. A variety of groups $\mathfrak{M}$ is called a $\Sigma$-variety (where $\Sigma$ is an abstract property) if the $\mathfrak{M}$-free groups have the property $\Sigma$.
$\qquad$ a) Which properties $\Sigma$ are preserved under multiplication and intersection of varieties? Is the $FN$ property preserved under these operations?
$\qquad$ b) Are all varieties obtained by multiplication and intersection from the nilpotent varieties $\mathfrak{N}_1, \mathfrak{N}_2, \dots$ (where $\mathfrak{N}_1$ is the variety of abelian groups) $FN$-varieties?

Progress

a) The property $FN$ is preserved by multiplication of varieties (A. L. Shmel'kin, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., 29 (1973), 239–252). The property $FN$ is not preserved by the intersection of varieties. The following example is due to L. G. Kovács. Let $\mathfrak{U}$ and $\mathfrak{V}$ be the varieties of all nilpotent groups of class at most 4 satisfying the identities $[x, y, y, x] \equiv 1$ and $[[x, y], [z, t]] \equiv 1$, respectively. Then $\mathfrak{U}$ and $\mathfrak{V}$ are $FN$-varieties because 1) both of them are nilpotent of class at most 4 and contain all nilpotent groups of class $\leqslant 3$, and 2) relatively free groups in $\mathfrak{U}$ and $\mathfrak{V}$ are torsion-free (well-known for $\mathfrak{V}$ and follows for $\mathfrak{U}$ from (P. Fitzpatrick, L. G. Kovács, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A, 35, no. 1 (1983), 59–73)). On the other hand, $\mathfrak{U} \cap \mathfrak{V}$ is not an $FN$-variety because the relatively free group in $\mathfrak{U} \cap \mathfrak{V}$ of rank 3 is not torsion-free. Indeed, every torsion-free group in $\mathfrak{U} \cap \mathfrak{V}$ is of class $\leqslant 3$ (follows from the paper by Fitzpatrick and Kovács cited above), and there is a 3-generated (exponent 2)-by-(exponent 2) group of class precisely 4 in $\mathfrak{U} \cap \mathfrak{V}$. (A. N. Krasil'nikov, Letter of July, 17, 1998.)

b) Yes (Yu. M. Gorchakov, Algebra i Logika, 6, no. 3 (1967), 25–30 (Russian)).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.