19.84 (2018)

Solved

Let $\mathbb{P}$ be the set of all primes, and let $\sigma = \{\sigma_i \mid i \in I\}$ be some partition of $\mathbb{P}$ into disjoint subsets. A finite group $G$ is said to be $\sigma$-primary if $G$ is a $\sigma_i$-group for some $i$; $\sigma$-nilpotent if $G$ is a direct product of $\sigma$-primary groups; $\sigma$-soluble if every chief factor of $G$ is $\sigma$-primary. A subgroup $A$ of a finite group $G$ is said to be $\sigma$-subnormal in $G$ if there is a chain $A = A_0 \leqslant A_1 \leqslant \dots \leqslant A_n = G$ such that for every $i$ either $A_{i-1} \trianglelefteq A_i$ or $A_i/(A_{i-1})_{A_i}$ is $\sigma$-primary, where $(A_{i-1})_{A_i}$ is the largest normal subgroup of $A_i$ contained in $A_{i-1}$. Suppose that a subgroup $A$ of a finite group $G$ is $\sigma$-subnormal in $\langle A, A^x \rangle$ for all $x \in G$. Is it true that then $A$ is $\sigma$-subnormal in $G$?

Progress

No, not always. For example, in $G = S_5$ with partition $\sigma = \{2, 3\} \cup \{5\}$ the subgroup $A = \langle (12) \rangle$ is $\sigma$-subnormal in $\langle A, A^x \rangle$ for every $x \in G$, but it is not $\sigma$-subnormal in $G$. (V. N. Tyutyanov, Letter of 28 August 2019.)

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.