17.121 (2010)

Open

Let $G$ be a group whose set of elements is the real numbers and which is “nicely definable” (see below). Does $G$ being $\aleph_\omega$-free imply it being free if “nicely definable” means
$\qquad$ a) being $F_\sigma$?
$\qquad$ b) being Borel?
$\qquad$ c) being analytic?
$\qquad$ d) being projective $L[\mathbb{R}]$?

See https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0212250.pdf for justification of the restrictions.

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.