15.19 (2002)

Open

Let $p$ be a prime, and $\mathcal{F}_p$ the class of finitely generated groups acting faithfully on a $p$-regular rooted tree by finite automata. Any group in $\mathcal{F}_p$ is residually-$p$ (residually in the class of finite $p$-groups) and has word problem that is solvable in (at worst) exponential time. There exist therefore groups that are residually-$p$, have a solvable word problem, and do not belong to $\mathcal{F}_p$; though no concrete example is known. For instance:
$\qquad$ a) Is it true that some (or even all) the groups given in (R. I. Grigorchuk, Math. USSR–Sb., 54 (1986), 185–205) do not belong to $\mathcal{F}_p$ when the sequence $\omega$ is computable, but not periodic?
$\qquad$ b) Does $\mathbb{Z} \wr (\mathbb{Z} \wr \mathbb{Z})$ belong to $\mathcal{F}_2$? (Here the wreath products are restricted.)
See (A. M. Brunner, S. Sidki, J. Algebra, 257 (2002), 51–64) and (R. I. Grigorchuk, V. V. Nekrashevich, V. I. Sushchanskiĭ, in: Dynamical systems, automata, and infinite groups. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 231 (2000), 128–203).

Progress

*b) Yes, it does (A. C. Dantas, J. R. Oliveira, T. M. G. Santos, Preprint, 2024, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.16678).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.