15.1 (2002)

Open

(P. Longobardi, M. Maj, A. H. Rhemtulla). Let $w = w(x_1, \dots, x_n)$ be a group word in $n$ variables $x_1, \dots, x_n$, and $V(w)$ the variety of groups defined by the law $w = 1$. Let $V(w^*)$ (respectively, $V(w^\#)$) be the class of all groups $G$ in which for every $n$ infinite subsets $S_1, \dots, S_n$ there exist $s_i \in S_i$ such that $w(s_1, \dots, s_n) = 1$ (respectively, $\langle s_1, \dots, s_n \rangle \in V(w)$).
$\qquad$ a) Is there some word $w$ and an infinite group $G$ such that $G \in V(w^\#)$ but $G \notin V(w)$?
$\qquad$ b) Is there some word $w$ and an infinite group $G$ such that $G \in V(w^*)$ but $G \notin V(w^\#)$?
The answer to both of these questions is likely to be "yes". It is known that in a) $w$ cannot be any of several words such as $x_1^n$, $[x_1, \dots, x_n]$, $[x_1, x_2]^2$, $(x_1x_2)^3 x_2^{-3} x_1^{-3}$, and $x_1^{a_1} \dots x_n^{a_n}$ for any non-zero integers $a_1, \dots, a_n$.

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.