11.104 (1990)

Solved

Let $G$ be a finite group of order $p^a \cdot q^b \dots$, where $p, q, \dots$ are distinct primes. Introduce distinct variables $x_p, x_q, \dots$ corresponding to $p, q, \dots$ . Define functions $f, \phi$ from the lattice of subgroups of $G$ to the polynomial ring $\mathbb{Z}[x_p, x_q, \dots]$ as follows: (1) if $H$ has order $p^\alpha \cdot q^\beta \dots$, then $f(H) = x_p^\alpha \cdot x_q^\beta \dots$; (2) for all $H \leqslant G$, we have $\sum_{K \leqslant H} \phi(K) = f(H)$. Then $f(G), \phi(G)$ may be called the order and Eulerian polynomials of $G$. Substituting $p^m, q^m, \dots$ for $x_p, x_q, \dots$ in these polynomials we get the $m$th power of the order of $G$ and the number of ordered $m$-tuples of elements that generate $G$ respectively. It is known that if $G$ is $p$-solvable, then $\phi(G)$ is a product of a polynomial in $x_p$ and a polynomial in the remaining variables. Consequently, if $G$ is solvable, $\phi(G)$ is the product of a polynomial in $x_p$ by a polynomial in $x_q$ by . . . . Are the converses of these statements true
$\qquad$ a) for solvable groups?
$\qquad$ b) for $p$-solvable groups?

Progress

Yes, the converses are true: a) for solvable groups (E. Detomi, A. Lucchini, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 70 (2004), 165–181); b) for $p$-solvable groups (E. Damian, A. Lucchini, Commun. Algebra, 35 (2007), 3451–3472).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.