10.16 (1986)

Open

A class of groups is called a direct variety if it is closed under taking subgroups, factor-groups, and direct products (Yu. M. Gorchakov, Groups with Finite Classes of Conjugate Elements, Moscow, Nauka, 1978 (Russian)). It is obvious that the class of $FC$-groups is a direct variety. P. Hall (J. London Math. Soc., 34, no. 3 (1959), 289–304) showed that the class of finite groups and the class of abelian groups taken together do not generate the class of $FC$-groups as a direct variety, and it was shown in (L. A. Kurdachenko, Ukrain. Math. J., 39, no. 3 (1987), 255–259) that the direct variety of $FC$-groups is also not generated by the class of groups with finite derived subgroups. Is the direct variety of $FC$-groups generated by the class of groups with finite derived subgroups together with the class of $FC$-groups having quasicyclic derived subgroups?

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.