7.28 (1980)

Open

Let $G(K)$ be the Chevalley group over a commutative ring $K$ associated with the root system $\Phi$ as defined in (R. Steinberg, Lectures on Chevalley groups, Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn., 1967). This group is generated by the root subgroups $x_r(K)$, $r \in \Phi$. We define an elementary carpet of type $\Phi$ over $K$ to be any collection of additive subgroups $\{\mathfrak{A}_r \mid r \in \Phi\}$ of $K$ satisfying the condition
$$c_{ij,rs}\mathfrak{A}_r^i\mathfrak{A}_s^j \subseteq \mathfrak{A}_{ir+js} \quad \text{for } r, s, ir + js \in \Phi, \ i > 0, \ j > 0,$$ where $c_{ij,rs}$ are constants defined by the Chevalley commutator formula and $\mathfrak{A}_r^i = \{a^i \mid a \in \mathfrak{A}_r\}$. What are necessary and sufficient conditions (in terms of the $\mathfrak{A}_r$) on the elementary carpet to ensure that the subgroup $\langle x_r(\mathfrak{A}_r) \mid r \in \Phi \rangle$ of $G(K)$ intersects with $x_r(K)$ in $x_r(\mathfrak{A}_r)$? See also 15.46.

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.