20.13 (2022)

Open

(a) If an abelian group can be written as a homomorphic image of a nonprincipal countable ultraproduct of not necessarily abelian groups $G_i$, must it be a homomorphic image of a nonprincipal countable ultraproduct of abelian groups? See (G. M. Bergman, Pacific J. Math., 274 (2015), 451–495).

(b) If an abelian group can be written as a homomorphic image of a direct product of an infinite family of not necessarily abelian finite groups, can it be written as a homomorphic image of a direct product of finite abelian groups?

To see that neither question is trivial, choose for each $n > 0$ a finite group $G_n$ which is perfect but has elements which cannot be written as products of fewer than $n$ commutators. Then both the direct product of the $G_n$ and any nonprincipal ultraproduct of those groups will have elements which are not products of commutators; hence its abelianization $A$ will be nontrivial. There is no evident family of abelian groups from which to obtain $A$ as an image of a nonprincipal ultraproduct, nor a family of finite abelian groups from which to obtain $A$ as an image of a direct product.

Progress

*(a) Yes, it must (S. M. Corson, Preprint, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09228).
*(b) Yes it can (S. M. Corson, Preprint, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09228).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.