18.42 (2014)

Open

For an orientation-preserving homeomorphism $f : S^1 \to S^1$ of a unit circle $S^1$, let $\tilde{f}$ be its lifting to a homeomorphism of $\mathbb{R}$; then the rotation number of $f$ is defined to be the limit $\lim_{n \to \infty}(\tilde{f}^n(x) - x)/n$ (which is independent of the point $x \in S^1$). Let $F$ be a free group of rank 2 with generators $a, b$. For $w \in F$ and $r, s \in \mathbb{R}$, let $R(w, r, s)$ denote the maximum value of the (real-valued) rotation number of $w$, under all representations from $F$ to the universal central extension of $\text{Homeo}^+(S^1)$ for which the rotation number of $a$ is $r$, and the rotation number of $b$ is $s$.
$\qquad$ a) If $r, s$ are rational, must $R(w, r, s)$ be rational?
$\qquad$ b) Let $R(w, r^-, s^-)$ denote the supremum of the rotation number of $w$ (as above) under all representations for which $a$ and $b$ are conjugate to rotations through $r$ and $s$, respectively (in the universal central extension of $\text{Homeo}^+(S^1)$). Is $R(w, r^-, s^-)$ always rational if $r$ and $s$ are rational?
$\qquad$ c) Weak Slippery Conjecture: Let $w$ be a word containing only positive powers of $a$ and $b$. A pair of values $(r, s)$ is slippery if there is a strict inequality $R(w, r', s') < R(w, r^-, s^-)$ for all $r' < r$, $s' < s$. Is it true that then $R(w, r^-, s^-) = h_a(w)r + h_b(w)s$, where $h_a(w)$ counts the number of $a$’s in $w$, and $h_b(w)$ counts the number of $b$’s in $w$?
$\qquad$ d) Slippery Conjecture: More precisely, is it always (without assuming $(r, s)$ being slippery) true that if $w$ has the form $w = a^{\alpha_1} b^{\beta_1} \dots a^{\alpha_m} b^{\beta_m}$ (all positive) and $R(w, r, s) = p/q$ where $p/q$ is reduced, then $|p/q - h_a(w)r - h_b(w)s| \leqslant m/q$?

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.