17.73 (2010)

Solved

Let $G$ be a finite simple group of Lie type defined over a field of characteristic $p$, and $V$ an absolutely irreducible $G$-module over a field of the same characteristic. Is it true that in the following cases the split extension of $V$ by $G$ must contain an element whose order is distinct from the order of any element of $G$?
$\qquad$ a) $G = U_4(q)$;
$\qquad$ b) $G = S_{2n}(q)$, $n \geqslant 3$;
$\qquad$ c) $G = O_{2n+1}(q)$, $n \geqslant 3$;
$\qquad$ d) $G = O^+_{2n}(q)$, $n \geqslant 4$;
$\qquad$ e) $G = O^-_{2n}(q)$, $n \geqslant 4$;
$\qquad$ f) $G = {}^3D_4(q)$, $q \neq 2$;
$\qquad$ g) $G = E_6(q)$;
$\qquad$ h) $G = {}^2E_6(q)$;
$\qquad$ i) $G = E_7(q)$;
$\qquad$ j) $G = G_2(2^m)$.

Progress

Yes, it is true: a) (M. A. Grechkoseeva, S. V. Skresanov, Siberian Electron. Math. Rep., 17 (2020), 585–589); b)–i) (M. A. Grechkoseeva, J. Algebra Appl., 14, no. 4 (2015), Article ID 1550056); j) (A. V. Vasil'ev, A. M. Staroletov, Algebra Logic, 52, no. 1 (2013), 1–14).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.