16.82 (2006)

Solved

Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a non-empty class of finite groups closed under taking homomorphic images, subgroups, and direct products. With every group $G \in \mathcal{X}$ we associate some set $\tau(G)$ of subgroups of $G$. We say that $\tau$ is a subgroup functor on $\mathcal{X}$ if:
$\qquad$ 1) $G \in \tau(G)$ for all $G \in \mathcal{X}$, and
$\qquad$ 2) for each epimorphism $\varphi : A \to B$, where $A, B \in \mathcal{X}$, and for any $H \in \tau(A)$ and $T \in \tau(B)$ we have $H^\varphi \in \tau(B)$ and $T^{\varphi^{-1}} \in \tau(A)$.

A subgroup functor $\tau$ is closed if for each group $G \in \mathcal{X}$ and for every subgroup $H \in \mathcal{X} \cap \tau(G)$ we have $\tau(H) \subseteq \tau(G)$. The set $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{X})$ consisting of all closed subgroup functors on $\mathcal{X}$ is a lattice (in which $\tau_1 \leqslant \tau_2$ if and only if $\tau_1(G) \subseteq \tau_2(G)$ for every group $G \in \mathcal{X}$). It is known that $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{X})$ is a chain if and only if $\mathcal{X}$ is a class of $p$-groups for some prime $p$ (Theorem 1.5.17 in S. F. Kamornikov and M. V. Sel'kin, Subgroups functors and classes of finite groups, Belaruskaya Navuka, Minsk, 2001 (Russian)).

Is there a non-nilpotent class $\mathcal{X}$ such that the width of the lattice $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{X})$ is at most $|\pi(\mathcal{X})|$ where $\pi(\mathcal{X})$ is the set of all prime divisors of the orders of the groups in $\mathcal{X}$?

Progress

No such classes exist (S. F. Kamornikov, Siberian Math. J., 51, no. 5 (2010), 824–829).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.