15.76 (2002)

Partially Solved

If $\Theta$ is a variety of groups, then let $\Theta^0$ denote the category of all free groups of finite rank in $\Theta$. It is proved (G. Mashevitzky, B. Plotkin, E. Plotkin J. Algebra, 282 (2004), 490–512) that if $\Theta$ is the variety of all groups, then every automorphism of the category $\Theta^0$ is an inner one. The same is true if $\Theta$ is the variety of all abelian groups.
$\qquad$ a) Is this true for the variety of nilpotent groups of class 2?
$\qquad$ b) The same is true if $\Theta$ is the variety of all nilpotent groups of class $\leqslant d$, for $d \geqslant 2$ (A. Tsurkov, Int. J. Algebra Comput., 17 (2007), 1273–1281). Is this true for the varieties of solvable groups? of metabelian groups?

An automorphism $\varphi$ of a category is called inner if it is isomorphic to the identity automorphism. Let $s : 1 \to \varphi$ be a function defining this isomorphism. Then for every object $A$ we have an isomorphism $s_A : A \to \varphi(A)$ and for any morphism of objects $\mu : A \to B$ we have $\varphi(\mu) = s_B \mu s_A^{-1}$.

Progress

a) Yes, it is, even for the variety of nilpotent groups of any class $n$ (A. Tsurkov, Int. J. Algebra Comput., 17 (2007), 1273–1281).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.