15.41 (2002)

Open

Let $R(m, p)$ denote the largest finite $m$-generator group of prime exponent $p$.
$\qquad$ a) Can the nilpotency class of $R(m, p)$ be bounded by a polynomial in $m$? (This is true for $p = 2, 3, 5, 7$.)
$\qquad$ b) Can the nilpotency class of $R(m, p)$ be bounded by a linear function in $m$? (This is true for $p = 2, 3, 5$.)
$\qquad$ c) In particular, can the nilpotency class of $R(m, 7)$ be bounded by a linear function in $m$?

My guess is “no” to the first two questions for general $p$, but “yes” to the third. By contrast, a beautiful and simple argument of Mike Newman shows that if $m \geqslant 2$ and $k \geqslant 2$ ($k \geqslant 3$ for $p = 2$), then the order of $R(m, p^k)$ is at least $p^{p^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot^{p^m}}}}}$, with $p$ appearing $k$ times in the tower; see (M. Vaughan-Lee, E. I. Zelmanov, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (A), 67, no. 2 (1999), 261–271).

Comments

All comments are the responsibility of the user. Comments appearing on this page are not verified for correctness. Please keep posts mathematical and on topic. If you want to submit a proof (or a partial proof), please use the dedicated proof submission form rather than posting it in the comments.
Order by newest first or oldest first.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Proof claims

Proof claims are the responsibility of the submitter. Appearance here does not mean the claim has been checked for mathematical correctness. Moderators only screen for spam, abuse, and obviously low-effort submissions.

No proof claims yet.